做 Support 相對 Weaken 來說,難度會高一些的原因是因為,很難確認要打原因還是打結果。所以許多答案選項,就是直接給這因果做個加分作用:
For example:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Many breakfast cereals are fortified with vitamin supplements. Some of these cereals provide
100 percent of the recommended daily requirement of vitamins. Nevertheless, a well-
balanced breakfast, including a variety of foods, is a better source of those vitamins than are
such fortified breakfast cereals alone.
Which of the following, if true, would most strongly support the position above?
(A) In many foods, the natural combination of vitamins with other nutrients makes those vitamins more usable by the body than are vitamins added in vitamin supplements.
(B) People who regularly eat cereals fortified with vitamin supplements sometimes neglect to eat the foods in which the vitamins occur naturally.
(C) Foods often must be fortified with vitamin supplements because naturally occurring vitamins are removed during processing.
(D) Unprocessed cereals are naturally high in several of the vitamins that are usually added to fortified breakfast cereals.
(E) Cereals containing vitamin supplements are no harder to digest than similar cereals without added vitamins.
Ans: A
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
此題答案相當好選,題目是說,多樣性的飲食提供的維他命,是比維他命補充的 cereals 來的好。
答案選項為,天然的複合維他命對人體是比維他命補充物來的更有用。天然複合維他命 <--> 多樣性的飲食,維他命補充物 <--> 維他命補充物的 cereals。
直接給兩邊來個加分作用,相當直接。所以 Support 題型,做題時比較需要強調雙邊的加分效應,和 Weaken 稍有不同。
留言列表