GMAT/留學申請專業顧問 Donz 之資訊交流園地

PP + GWD 模考軟體:

1. GMAT Powerprep: http://goo.gl/xB35Fn  

官方公開的兩回模考軟體及題目，介面也最接近 GMAT 真實考試介面，並有官方正確答案。其算分機制完全根據 GMAT 實戰算分機制，為最準確的模擬介面及測分軟體。 

詳細介紹在此: http://ndxica.pixnet.net/blog/post/43473719  

2. GWD + 考滿分網站: http://gmat.kaomanfen.com/exam

考滿分將 GWD 題目放入模擬的真實考試介面，讓同學可以盡可能的利用模擬的考試介面來做 GWD 模考。不過此介面和實際的考試還是有所落差，算分機制也往往會高出 40-50 分左右，請同學要下修模考分數。
詳細介紹在此: http://ndxica.pixnet.net/blog/post/43473737

其實由 PP/GWD 的官方題目模考，已經是非常足夠，也是最擬真的模考軟體。然而，若同學還需要更多模考資源，在此介紹如下。

在敘述之前，先說結論:  模考軟體最好的順序選擇為 PP  -->  GWD。若還需要更多模考，可加入 Manhattan。剩下的模考軟體，基本上不準，並且由於是國外設計的題目，有許多是針對國外較薄弱的數學為主，而這部分亞洲同學大部分沒有問題 (且國外出的數學題往往過度偏離 GMAT 數學方向)。所以剩下的模考，建議是在同學已經沒有題目可以練習，那才需要將這些模考題目來出來練習。

這裡 GMAT Club 有一個相當有趣的模考和實際分數換算機，可供同學參考: http://gmatclub.com/gmat-score-calculator/  

其他機構之模考軟體:

1. Manhattan: https://goo.gl/NdQMfy 

提供 1 free test，或是可以買他們的 study guide，可以得到 6次免費考試。 Manhattan 的 Verbal 題目，為除了官方題目當中，最擬真的題目。Manhattan 會試著根據 GMAT 的出題方向而做改寫，雖然方向還是有差距，但算是最接近的題目。但數學部分就過難，且偏離 GMAT 考題方向許多。為做完 PP 及 GWD 的模考首選。

2. GMAT Club: http://gmatclub.com/tests-beta/

Tests: 25 tests，2 free trials  

網友評價參考:  After taking 5 of the 6, I felt that these CAT problems are very close to the REAL GMAT CAT exams, since most of GMAT Club’s questions seems to be created though manipulating past questions and past real exam questions. But RC seems to be more difficult than GMAT PREP tests. Compared to MGMAT and Kaplan GMAT, GMAT Club’s questions were TOUGH… (分數相對比 Manhattan (MGMAT) 嚴格)

http://gmatclub.com/forum/ucp.php?mode=register

在此註冊 (注意 G in GMAT stand for 填入 "graduate"):  

在此註冊可以獲得五項和 GMAT CLUB 合作的 5 個模考 free trial，算是相當方便 (如果希望模考越多越好的人來說啦.....) 

分別就這提供的 free trials test 做個介紹:

3. Magoosh Test: https://gmat.magoosh.com/plans  

為美國近年竄起之 testprep 機構，其教材及模考在 GRE 的名氣等同於 GMAT 的 Manhattan，但在 GMAT 考試當中知名度還不算高。有網友指出其算分散 economist 差不多，這就見仁見智了。

4. e-gmat: https://e-gmat.com/registration/  

有提供 free questions，有網友指出其中的 RC 編排的不錯。而此網站的收費考試 (含課程) 非常昂貴，不建議特別使用

5. Economist GMAT Tutor: https://gmat.economist.com/     

大名鼎鼎的 Economist 在近年來提供 GMAT 教材及模考。提供免費 7-days trial，收費網頁: https://gmat.economist.com/plans  (非常昂貴)

網友評價參考: I feel the Quant section (both PS and DS) is a little more logic driven and less calculation intensive than the real GMAT; therefore, the difficulty level, compared with the GMAT, will be largely dependent on how comfortable you are between applying logic, breaking down complicated statements to simpler equations, and doing hard core calculation intensive maths. The Verbal section is a little bit more difficult than the real thing - RC is way harder while CR and SC are closer, but still harder, to the real GMAT.

6. Veritasprep: http://www.veritasprep.com/gmat/gmat-practice-test/  

1 free and 7 for $49

網友評價參考:  Overall Thoughts -felt that the Math was a bit too easy, I've missed many more on MGMAT GMAT tests and scored higher on the Math section -don't recall any exponent problems which i was surprised about -data sufficiency problems didn't seem challenging enough -Verbal seemed the most off -near the tail end of my Verbal, i think i had about 7-8 SC problems straight which is unusual right? -also the RC passages were very difficult to read, not in a challenging way but the subject matters were also off...philosophy and ethical issues...i didn't have a science RC passage

7. Jamboree:  https://www.jamboreeeducation.com/gmat

印度的補教機構，也有提供 free trial tests，評價不多。

8. Princeton Review: http://goo.gl/crHAR0

1 free test  

http://goo.gl/2fDF4M  而購買 "Cracking the GMAT" 這本書有提供 free tests

美國鄉民認為， Princeton Review 適合在 600-700 左右的考生

9. Kaplan: http://goo.gl/aykp1X  

1 free test，USD 30 for 6 tests

網友評價參考: Good tricks and though questions in both Math and Verbal. Kaplan CATs will force you to think in the right direction. In general, results from Kaplan are lower then results from actual GMAT (due to marketing reasons, most likely) therefore do not be discouraged by low scores.

10. GMAT Pill: http://goo.gl/p1tXRK

使用 GMAT 模考介面、並和考滿分網站一樣，會對你的考試結果作分析。Sample Report: http://bit.ly/1CJGw5P

11. 800 score: http://www.800score.com/download4.html

1 free quant test

網友評價參考:   I took a few of them. my experience was that the math was super difficult and somewhat unrealistic -- the hard questions took too long to calculate. but MGMAT is conceptually more difficult and more of an IQ test (more like the real GMAT). the 800score verbal was rather nuanced and especially the reading comp tone questions were somewhat off. the sentence corrections q's were good, and critical reasoning wasn't terrible but again something funky about their logic. Once I got the nuances of the verbal down (learned how they were testing after 2 practice tests) my verbal went from 70% to 99%. shows you how effective their testing technique is ... the overall scoring for 800score is not very consistent (or maybe I wasn't). my range was 670 to 740 and I didn't see much correlation between content mastery and score improvement.